Shark WANDVAC Cordless Handheld Vacuum vs Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro+ Cordless Handheld
vs
Quick take: The Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro+ Cordless Handheld costs $26 less.
| Spec | Shark WANDVAC Cordless Handheld Vacuum | Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro+ Cordless Handheld |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$100 | ~$74 |
| Type | Handheld | Handheld |
| Suction | Not disclosed | Not disclosed |
| Battery | 10 min | 10 min |
| Navigation | — | — |
| Filtration | Washable Filter | Washable Filter |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Bagged | No | No |
| Noise | — | 73 dB |
| Dustbin | 95 ml | 0.47 L |
| Water tank | — | — |
| Self-empty dock | No | No |
| Auto mop washing | No | No |
| Hot water washing | No | No |
| Obstacle avoidance | No | No |
| Carpet detection | No | No |
| Auto mop lifting | No | No |
| Multi-floor mapping | No | No |
| App control | No | No |
| Dimensions | 3.66 x 6.73 x 17.87 in | 4.76 x 5.71 x 21.3 in |
| Weight | 1.4 lbs | 3.09 lbs |
| Warranty | 1 year | 2 years |
Pros & cons
Shark WANDVAC Cordless Handheld Vacuum
- ✓Ultra-light at 1.4 lbs, easy to store on its charging dock
- ✓Crevice tool is well suited to car seats and tight gaps
- ✓One-touch dust cup emptying keeps hands clean
- ✓Affordable entry point into the Wandvac line
- ✓Washable fabric filter is cheap to maintain long-term
- ✗Shark does not publish a runtime spec; owner testing suggests roughly 10 minutes per charge
- ✗Small dust cup fills quickly and needs frequent emptying
- ✗Performance drops or the unit cuts out if the filter isn't cleaned regularly
- ✗Pet tool is a static bristle brush, not a motorized beater bar — weak on embedded pet hair
- ✗Only a 1-year warranty on the vacuum body
Shark UltraCyclone Pet Pro+ Cordless Handheld
- ✓Genuine motorized, self-cleaning pet power brush
- ✓Independent testing measured 14.7 minutes of runtime, beating Shark's own 10-minute rating
- ✓Dual cyclonic design avoids the clogging issues of older single-stage handhelds
- ✓Slim body reaches into tight car and upholstery gaps well
- ✓2-year warranty and a well-established, still-current product line
- ✗0.47L dust cup is on the smaller side for a pet-focused tool
- ✗No onboard storage mount for the crevice and scrubbing tools — easy to lose them
- ✗At 2.8 lbs, noticeably heavier than the Wandvac handhelds
- ✗Embedded pet hair on upholstery needs multiple passes even with the motorized brush
- ✗Older dual-cyclonic motor design compared to Shark's newer brushless handhelds