Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 vs Roborock Qrevo CurvX
Quick take: The Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 costs $100 less; the Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 has stronger suction (25,000 vs 22,000 Pa); the Roborock Qrevo CurvX runs longer per charge (220 vs 188 min).
Which one to buy
Fourteen out of 24 against 20 out of 24 is the number that separates these two Roborocks. That's how many test obstacles each avoided, and the Qrevo Edge 2's score sits below both its own predecessor and the category average. Edge 2 owners echo it, naming poor avoidance as a recurring theme. The Qrevo CurvX, $100 more, steered around rug tassels that had trapped another robot and recognizes pets so it can shut off the main brush near them.
On raw cleaning, the Edge 2 holds its own. It pulled 94% of embedded sand from carpet against a 78% average, its mopping scored roughly double the category average, and pet-hair pickup reached 89.5%. Owners who got a working unit call it near-flagship and say the house has never been cleaner. The catch is quality control: at least two owners received a first unit that wouldn't charge or dock, and others report inconsistent mop pressure, odd cleaning patterns and hair building up. Its 240 ml bin is also small.
The CurvX's case is hair and reach. It recorded zero hair tangling against a 28% average, removed 92% of debris from deep carpet, and its retracting LiDAR lets it duck under couches that haven't been cleaned in years. Testers say its warm-water mop pads lift dried stains. Its weak points: measured airflow came in below average despite the 22000 Pa rating, the bin is small enough that pet homes run the dock several times a week, and the hot-water flush is louder than the vacuum. Hands-on coverage so far is mostly from a small apartment, and the retracting turret is a first-generation part.
For most homes, and especially for pets or clutter, the CurvX is worth the extra $100: better avoidance and a tangle-free brush fix the two things that make a robot annoying to live with. The Edge 2 is the one for a tidy, carpet-heavy home that wants the strongest deep-carpet and mopping scores and will exchange a faulty first unit if needed.
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
For a tidy, carpet-heavy home that wants top deep-carpet and mopping results for $100 less, provided you can live with weaker obstacle avoidance and test it hard on arrival.
Roborock Qrevo CurvX
Best for pet owners with floor clutter or low couches, since it avoided 20 of 24 test obstacles and recorded zero hair tangling.
| Spec | Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 | Roborock Qrevo CurvX |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$1,100 | ~$1,200 |
| Type | Robot Vacuum & Mop | Robot Vacuum & Mop |
| Suction | 25000 Pa | 22000 Pa |
| Battery | 188 min | 220 min |
| Navigation | LiDAR + Camera | LiDAR + Camera |
| Filtration | — | — |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Bagged | — | — |
| Noise | — | — |
| Dustbin | 240 ml | — |
| Water tank | — | — |
| Self-empty dock | Yes | Yes |
| Auto mop washing | Yes | Yes |
| Hot water washing | Yes | Yes |
| Obstacle avoidance | Yes | Yes |
| Carpet detection | Yes | Yes |
| Auto mop lifting | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-floor mapping | Yes | Yes |
| App control | Yes | Yes |
| Dimensions | 13.86 x 13.86 x 3.14 in | — |
| Weight | — | — |
| Warranty | 1 year | 1 year |
Pros & cons
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2
- ✓94% embedded-sand removal on carpet in independent testing, well above the 78% category average
- ✓Mopping score roughly double the category average, among the best tested
- ✓Pet hair pickup improved to 89.5%, up from 80.5% on the original Qrevo Edge
- ✓Notably fast navigation and cleaning runs, about 16 minutes quicker than category average
- ✓176°F hot water mop washing dock with up to 65 days between manual dust emptying
- ✗Obstacle avoidance is a genuine step backward — 14/24 in testing, below both its predecessor and category average
- ✗240ml dustbin is smaller than the original Edge (325ml) and the category average (377ml), risking overflow with bulky debris
- ✗Roughly $1,300 street price puts it squarely against flagship competition
- ✗Manufacturer doesn't publish noise level or water tank capacity for this model
Roborock Qrevo CurvX
- ✓0% hair tangling in independent testing versus a 28% category average — genuinely tangle-free in practice
- ✓92% debris removal on deep carpet, tying for third place out of over 200 robot vacuums tested
- ✓20/24 obstacle-avoidance score, a real step up from earlier Roborock generations
- ✓Retractable LiDAR drops to a 100° rear view for cleaning under low furniture
- ✓One of the best-reviewed apps in the category, plus strong marks for Roborock customer service
- ✗Measured airflow runs below the category average despite the 22,000Pa headline suction figure
- ✗Dustbin is small enough that pet-heavy homes will be emptying the dock multiple times a week
- ✗Uses more mop water than average on the low setting (testers saw no streaking, but it's a heavier water user)
- ✗Manufacturer doesn't publish battery-free dimensions, weight, dustbin capacity, or noise level for this model
Roborock Qrevo Edge 2 vs Roborock Qrevo CurvX: common questions
Is the Roborock Qrevo CurvX worth $100 more than the Qrevo Edge 2?▾
For most buyers, yes. The CurvX avoided 20 of 24 test obstacles to the Edge 2's 14, and it recorded zero hair tangling. The Edge 2 answers with slightly better embedded-sand removal on carpet and strong mopping scores, which matters most in a tidy home.
Which handles pet hair better, the Qrevo Edge 2 or the Qrevo CurvX?▾
The CurvX, mainly on tangling: it scored 0% against a 28% average, and it turns off the main brush near pets. The Edge 2 picked up 89.5% of pet hair in testing, but one owner reported tangled hair building up and odd cleaning patterns.
Are defective units a bigger risk with the Qrevo Edge 2 than the Qrevo CurvX?▾
Edge 2 owners report it more. At least two received a first unit that wouldn't charge or dock, and replacements then worked well. CurvX reports center instead on its first-generation retracting LiDAR being an extra moving part, so keep the box and use the return window with either.