Dyson V8 Cyclone vs Dyson V10 Konical
vs
| Spec | Dyson V8 Cyclone | Dyson V10 Konical |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$399 | ~$399 |
| Type | Cordless Stick | Cordless Stick |
| Suction | 150 AW | 150 AW |
| Battery | 60 min | 60 min |
| Navigation | — | — |
| Filtration | Whole-machine sealed filtration | Whole-machine HEPA-sealed |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Bagged | No | No |
| Noise | — | — |
| Dustbin | 0.54 L | — |
| Water tank | — | — |
| Self-empty dock | No | No |
| Auto mop washing | No | No |
| Hot water washing | No | No |
| Obstacle avoidance | No | No |
| Carpet detection | No | No |
| Auto mop lifting | No | No |
| Multi-floor mapping | No | No |
| App control | No | No |
| Dimensions | — | — |
| Weight | 5.9 lbs | 5.75 lbs |
| Warranty | 2 years | 2 years |
Pros & cons
Dyson V8 Cyclone
- ✓150AW matches the V12 Detect Slim for hundreds less
- ✓60-minute max runtime, up from 40 on the old V8
- ✓De-tangling Motorbar cleaner head handed down from the flagships
- ✓Whole-machine sealed filtration captures 99.99% of 0.3-micron particles
- ✓5.9 lbs — lighter than the V15 and Gen5detect
- ✓Compatible with existing V8 attachments
- ✗Hold-down trigger rather than the newer models' power button
- ✗No auto-adjusting suction, laser, or particle sensor — two manual modes only
- ✗Sealed filtration but not HEPA-rated like the V15/Gen5
- ✗Too new for long-term reliability reports
- ✗Rarely discounted yet, unlike the mature Detect models
Dyson V10 Konical
- ✓Conical brush bars specifically engineered against long-hair wrap
- ✓All Floors Cones head illuminates dust and adapts to hard floor and carpet
- ✓Auto-empty Dok option (sold separately) is Dyson's first self-emptying cordless dock
- ✓Cheaper than the V11/V15/Gen5 lines while sharing the same de-tangling design language
- ✓60-minute max runtime
- ✗150AW suction is noticeably below the V11 (185AW) and V15/Gen5 (240-250AW) lines
- ✗Auto-empty Dok is a separate purchase, not included at this price
- ✗No laser dust reveal or particle sensor
- ✗Manufacturer-published dustbin capacity not listed on the pages found during research
- ✗New enough (2026) that independent long-term reliability data is still thin