Dyson V11 Extra vs Dyson V10 Konical

Quick take: The Dyson V11 Extra costs $31 less.

SpecDyson V11 ExtraDyson V10 Konical
Price~$469~$500
TypeCordless StickCordless Stick
Suction185 AW150 AW
Battery60 min60 min
Navigation
FiltrationWhole-machine HEPA-sealedWhole-machine HEPA-sealed
CordlessYesYes
BaggedNoNo
Noise
Dustbin0.76 L
Water tank
Self-empty dockNoNo
Auto mop washingNoNo
Hot water washingNoNo
Obstacle avoidanceNoNo
Carpet detectionNoNo
Auto mop liftingNoNo
Multi-floor mappingNoNo
App controlNoNo
Dimensions9.84 x 11.81 x 45.28 in
Weight6.6 lbs5.75 lbs
Warranty2 years2 years

Pros & cons

Dyson V11 Extra

  • 185AW motor with genuine fade-free suction across the full runtime
  • LCD screen shows remaining runtime and maintenance alerts, not just a light
  • Dynamic Load Sensor auto-adjusts power between carpet and hard floor
  • Noticeably cheaper than the Gen5detect/V15 while sharing similar core suction
  • Point-and-shoot bin emptying keeps hands out of the dust
  • No laser dust illumination or particle-counting sensor like the V15/Gen5 lines
  • LCD screen is a documented failure point once the vacuum is out of warranty
  • Bin capacity (0.76L) fills fast on a full-house clean
  • Several years old at this point in the lineup — replacement parts pricing has crept up
  • "App Control" here just means firmware/diagnostics, not scheduling or maps

Dyson V10 Konical

  • Conical brush bars specifically engineered against long-hair wrap
  • All Floors Cones head illuminates dust and adapts to hard floor and carpet
  • Auto-empty Dok option (sold separately) is Dyson's first self-emptying cordless dock
  • Cheaper than the V11/V15/Gen5 lines while sharing the same de-tangling design language
  • 60-minute max runtime
  • 150AW suction is noticeably below the V11 (185AW) and V15/Gen5 (240-250AW) lines
  • Auto-empty Dok is a separate purchase, not included at this price
  • No laser dust reveal or particle sensor
  • Manufacturer-published dustbin capacity not listed on the pages found during research
  • New enough (2026) that independent long-term reliability data is still thin