Is it better at mopping or vacuuming?

Mopping, decisively. Owners rave about spotless hard floors and the 167°F self-cleaning pad wash, while vacuuming is the documented weakness — it struggled with heavier debris like pistachio shells in testing, and Dreame X50 and 3i S10 Ultra owners report better pickup. If your home is mostly carpet, this is the wrong robot.

How does it compare to the Roborock Qrevo Curv?

The Narwal wins on obstacle avoidance and noise; the Roborock wins on suction, route efficiency, water consumption, and app polish. Gizmodo tested them side by side at similar prices and the Curv came out the more complete machine, with the Freo Z Ultra as the pick for camera-based avoidance and mopping.

Does it need to be plumbed in?

Not required, but heavy water use is this robot's signature flaw — it rinses its mops so often that owners refill the clean tank mid-clean in larger homes. If you're mopping daily over a bigger space, the auto-fill plumbing option (or the newer Narwal Flow, which addresses water use) is worth serious thought.

What are the ongoing costs?

Proprietary 2.5L dust bags rated for 120 days (though the app starts nagging around day 30), Narwal cleaning solution, and replacement mop pads and brushes that are pricey from Narwal directly — enough that owners openly recommend AliExpress third-party parts instead.

Is Narwal's customer support any good?

This is the most consistent complaint outside performance. Owners report warranty repairs that failed again with the identical fault, then paid-repair-only offers once out of warranty, plus overseas support that's slow and difficult. Buying from Costco for the return policy is the common workaround.

🧹

Robot Vacuum & Mop

~$1,200

Narwal

Narwal Freo Z Ultra

Name: Narwal Freo Z Ultra
Brand: Narwal
Price: 1200 USD
Availability: InStock

Narwal's follow-up to the Freo X Ultra adds dual RGB cameras with twin AI chips for real-time obstacle decisions, 12000Pa suction, adaptive hot-water mop washing, and a self-empty dock with dust compression.

Approx. price

~$1,200

Suction

12000 Pa

Navigation

LiDAR + Camera

Best For

Cluttered homes needing top-tier avoidance

Check price on Amazon →

We may earn a commission. Price and availability on Amazon’s site may differ.

Specifications

LiDAR + Camera

12000 Pa

210 min

Yes

Auto Mop Washing

Yes

Obstacle Avoidance

Yes

Carpet Detection

Yes

Auto Mop Lifting

Yes

Multi-Floor Mapping

Yes

Type

Robot Vacuum & Mop

Noise Level

65 dB

Dustbin Capacity

400 ml

Water Tank

350 ml

App Control

Yes

Dimensions

13.8 x 13.5 x 4.2 in

Weight

9.9 lbs

Warranty

1 year

Model

Freo Z Ultra

Highlights

Dual RGB Cameras + AI Chips12000Pa SuctionAdaptive Hot-Water Wash

Pros

✓Twin-camera AI avoidance rivals the best — owners report it threads toy-strewn floors untouched
✓Narwal's signature 12N pressure mopping leaves shiny floors streak-free
✓DirtSense re-washes pads and re-mops until water runs clean
✓Very quiet operation for its suction class
✓12mm mop lift plus mop-pad removal handles mixed flooring gracefully

Cons

✗Narwal's US parts and accessory availability still trails Roborock and iRobot
✗App has improved but room-editing and automation remain clunky
✗Tall dock with visible water tanks divides opinion aesthetically
✗Camera-first navigation needs decent ambient light for best avoidance

Owner Insights

The Freo Z Ultra is the robot people buy for mopping and obstacle avoidance, and on those two counts it delivers. The dual RGB cameras out-dodged the Roborock Qrevo Curv in head-to-head testing, and owners consistently describe floors as spotless and the machine as remarkably quiet. Owner sentiment runs about 73% positive — but the praise is nearly all about mopping, and the criticism is nearly all about everything else.

The practical experience has real friction. Suction is the weak point — Gizmodo titled its review 'Better Eyes, Weaker Muscles' after watching it choke on pistachio shells — so carpet-heavy homes should look elsewhere. It's also thirsty: the robot returns to the dock constantly to rinse its mops, burning through the clean-water tank before larger spaces are done, which is why plumbing kits and the newer Narwal Flow exist. It mops timidly around rugs and leaves multi-inch margins at walls. The dock itself is excellent — 167°F pad washing, self-emptying, genuinely clean-smelling — but the app is a step behind Roborock's and it nags about bag replacement months early.

This is a hard-floor household's machine, bought on sale. At the $550-650 it routinely hits, the mopping and obstacle avoidance are arguably unmatched at the price; at the $1,499 list price, a Roborock Qrevo Curv or Dreame X50 is a more complete robot. The other caveat is post-purchase: Narwal's support reputation is rough, with repeat failures after warranty repairs and difficult communication, so the Costco route with its return policy is the popular hedge.

Pros

+Dual RGB cameras deliver obstacle avoidance that beat the Roborock Qrevo Curv head-to-head in Gizmodo's testing — it reliably dodges socks, slippers, and cords on bare floors
+Genuinely quiet — one of the quietest vacuum-mop combos on the market, fine to run while you're in the room
+Mopping leaves floors spotless, and the dock washes pads in 167°F water so they stay clean instead of turning sour
+Anti-tangle brush handles pet hair well — long-hair households report almost no wrap
+Deep discounts are routine — launched at $1,499 but regularly drops to $550-650, and Costco sells bundles with a forgiving return policy

Cons

−Weak raw suction — Gizmodo's verdict was literally 'weaker muscles': it choked on pistachio shells and spat them back out elsewhere, and Dreame X50 owners report noticeably better vacuuming
−Drinks water absurdly fast — it returns to the dock to rinse mops after small sections, and owners refill the clean tank before a mid-size apartment is finished
−Leaves roughly 3-inch unmopped margins along walls and gives rugs an overly cautious wide berth — and it struggles to notice when a rug has been removed
−The app nags you to replace the dust bag around day 30 even though the 2.5L proprietary bags are rated for 120 days
−App offers less granular control than Roborock's, and map editing is tedious — several owners redid room divisions manually
−Routes are inexplicable and inefficient, stretching total cleaning time well past competitors
−Support horror stories are common: units repaired under warranty failing again with the same fault, hard-to-reach overseas support, and expensive OEM parts (owners buy AliExpress substitutes instead)