Samsung Jet Stick 95S vs Miele Triflex HX3
vs
Quick take: The Miele Triflex HX3 costs $1 less; the Miele Triflex HX3 runs longer per charge (70 vs 60 min).
| Spec | Samsung Jet Stick 95S | Miele Triflex HX3 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | ~$850 | ~$849 |
| Type | Cordless Stick | Cordless Stick |
| Suction | 280 W | — |
| Battery | 60 min | 70 min |
| Navigation | — | — |
| Filtration | — | — |
| Cordless | Yes | Yes |
| Bagged | No | No |
| Noise | — | 74 dB |
| Dustbin | — | 0.5 L |
| Water tank | — | — |
| Self-empty dock | No | No |
| Auto mop washing | No | No |
| Hot water washing | No | No |
| Obstacle avoidance | No | No |
| Carpet detection | No | No |
| Auto mop lifting | No | No |
| Multi-floor mapping | No | No |
| App control | No | No |
| Dimensions | — | 10.25 x 51.1 x 11 in |
| Weight | Not disclosed | 8 lbs |
| Warranty | 1 year | — |
Pros & cons
Samsung Jet Stick 95S
- ✓Smart Boost automatically ramps power on carpet or heavy debris
- ✓Jet Standing Station lets the vacuum stand on its own without a wall-mounted dock
- ✓60-minute runtime with a longer-lasting removable battery
- ✓Top suction spec in Samsung's conventional (non-Bespoke) Jet line
- ✓Lightweight design for overhead and stair cleaning
- ✗Suction is quoted in watts, not Air Watts, making it hard to compare against the 75/85S or rival sticks
- ✗Samsung hasn't published a specific filtration claim (no confirmed HEPA) for this model
- ✗No self-empty station - at this price several rivals include one
- ✗No app control or smart diagnostics
- ✗No published weight, dimensions, or dustbin capacity
Miele Triflex HX3
- ✓Up to 70 minutes with non-powered tools
- ✓Quieter than many sticks at 74 dB
- ✓0.5 L bin
- ✓Direct successor to the HX2 with the same three-in-one design
- ✗Only 38 minutes with the electrobrush
- ✗8 lb is heavy for a stick
- ✗$849 before any in-cart promotion
- ✗Suction and warranty are not published